I always thought that the strategy behind the sweet names for skin products was to ride the wave of sugary products - many times, products that you know you shouldn't eat, so you just put them on your face instead. Growing up, I'd see this happening with "make up for kids" (you know, little lip glosses and stuff). But this piece gives it a different depth of evil marketing. Thank you for sharing!
I always thought that the strategy behind the sweet names for skin products was to ride the wave of sugary products - many times, products that you know you shouldn't eat, so you just put them on your face instead. Growing up, I'd see this happening with "make up for kids" (you know, little lip glosses and stuff). But this piece gives it a different depth of evil marketing. Thank you for sharing!
I always thought that the strategy behind the sweet names for skin products was to ride the wave of sugary products - many times, products that you know you shouldn't eat, so you just put them on your face instead. Growing up, I'd see this happening with "make up for kids" (you know, little lip glosses and stuff). But this piece gives it a different depth of evil marketing. Thank you for sharing!
makes sense!